Benedictus Deus

Benedictum Nomen Sanctum eius

Paul VI and Pentecost

Filed under: Church Issues,Liturgical Calendar,Time After Pentecost — June 12, 2014 @ 2:44 pm

A few days ago on Rorate Caeli‘s twitter feed, they mentioned the story of Paul VI crying on the first Pentecost Monday after the reform. As the story goes, he was surprised to find green vestments laid out for him. He asked where the red vestments were, and was told by his MC that there is no more octave of Pentecost, it’s right into “ordinary time” now. Shocked, Paul IV asked “who is do this?” The MC told him, “you did.” Then he wept.

Rorate called this story a myth, and I couldn’t agree more. This story comes around every Pentecost, and frankly I find in literally incredible (unable to be believed). In fact I think I left a comment to that effect on their blog years ago. Anyway, I suppose who ever came up with this tale had the good intention of absolving Paul VI from some his culpability for the liturgical destruction he unleashed. But to my mind, the story does just the opposite.

One of the pope’s primary duties is to safeguard the faith, which includes the liturgical practices which are part and parcel of it. Paul VI promulgated the most sweeping changes to the liturgy ever in the 2000 year history of the church. To suggest, as this myth does, that he didn’t know what he was doing, but just willy-nilly signed off on these changes, would be charging him with dereliction of duty in the extreme. I mean, you couldn’t be that negligent if you tried.  Then to top it off, he didn’t even bother correcting the mistake after he realized it.  Ridiculous.  I simply cannot believe this story.

1 Comment

  1. John R:

    “Then to top it off, he didn’t even bother correcting the mistake after he realized it.”

    That right there is the strongest reason to believe that the story is a myth. No doubt he may have been conflicted and sorrowful about many things, but he was a firm “reformer” from his youngest days as a priest – e.g. Mass facing the people with a group of students back in the ’30’s, a strong push for vernacularization while Archbishop of Milan in the ’50’s. He knew what he was doing, and documented minutes of the Consilium meetings which were drawing up the Novus Ordo reveal a very involved and up-to-the-minute knowledge of what was happening by Paul VI. Ergo, he would have had to do a personal about-face to restore the Pentecost Octave among many other things. The fact that he didn’t in the remaining eight years of his pontificate after this supposed regret clearly shows that he wasn’t serious enough about said regret, if any, to rectify it. Not even some kind of “optional” Octave.

    The Paul VI as “helpless victim” of radical “reformers” is a convenient narrative of the Neo-Con establishment which goes through painstaking lengths to defend and redeem the Novus Ordo at all costs because they need to prop up their ultramontane view of the papacy. To admit that a pope could err (even with full knowledge) is inconvenient to that narrative.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.